Jump to content

Is It Any Wonder Many Physicians Think We Are Idiots?


Recommended Posts

1st patient of the day. Healthy 36 YO male with no history or co-morbidities sees an NP in FP with acute low back pain after handling some farm animals 10 days ago. Imaging? Nope.... Ok not really a problem. I might not have either. Meds? Nope. PT Nope. Referral to neurosurgery.

These are the things that make life hard for all of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Careful here. Not sure if this is the whole story. It’s easier to pint finger. Have you worked in primary care? Was there anything on exam that could have warranted imaging or a referral to neurosurgery? The patients insurance carrier that could have made it difficult for quick access to a specialist? Just thinking out loud here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I worked in FP for 20 years. The patient is on Medicaid which makes referrals difficult on a good day but we have PT and Physical Medicine available for Medicaid patients.

This was a turf and a lazy one at that. Neurosurg is going to refuse to see the patient if they haven't already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, neurosurgery without a workup?  While it's possible that "OMG, your left leg is totally flaccid, and you've been pissing all over yourself" maybe neurosurgery wouldn't be the first choice.  Before everyone jumps on the np bashing bandwagon, this does not seem like an np post, just a "hey, let's use some evidence and common sense" post.

Most people have disk herniation without neuro findings or even pain.  Many with significant pain and neuro findings have minimal MRI findings.  Many fall in between.

Most herniations respond to conservative measures.  X-ray shows bone, so unless there is a trauma or other good rationale, dont, even if their uncle's best friends room-mate had x, y, or z. 

Also, neurosurgery?  Personally, I would have turned to the ED.  Sounds emergent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just happened to be an NP. This was a guy with a backache from bending and lifting. Young, healthy, trim. No back history. No risk factors. No significant findings on exam. Neurosurgery referral without any workup or attempts at treatment? No no no....

I don't know if I am sensitized today or if I'm just watching for these things because the profession has so much going on that I am looking for things that can and will be turned against us. This morning I saw a 3 year old with a 2 day old cold whose PNP gave steroids and antibiotics to. The kid was happy as a clam and basically had a runny nose. Another who documented "erythematous pharynx" and "swollen pharynx" and "normal pharynx" in the same sentence.

I'm not the greatest PA that ever lived and heaven knows there are oceans of things I don't know but these things are basic and reflect...I dunno....laziness. I know some of it is the dreaded Press Gainey survey and patient satisfactions scores but cumon people....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GetMeOuttaThisMess said:

So let’s learn from this. What are the indications to obtain plain films for non-traumatic back pain, i.e.-fall? Students?

Without looking anything up.... I almost never do plain films on first visit of atraumatic low back pain without concerning findings. Second visit unimproved or if things worsen? Maybe...depending on the findings and how the story might have changed as things evolved. Always before a referral even if I am sending them to PT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
12 minutes ago, sas5814 said:

Without looking anything up.... I almost never do plain films on first visit of atraumatic low back pain without concerning findings. Second visit unimproved or if things worsen? Maybe...depending on the findings and how the story might have changed as things evolved.

Scott knows this, but the exception being old folks. some of them cough and get fxs or have metastatic dz, etc

Of course my bar for "old folks" keeps getting older as I do. In school we learned to consider films over age 55. Now I don't think of 55 year olds as being "old". ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

especially fever in folks who are "sketchy". (I'm thinking epidural abscess in the IV drug users). OF course then we are talking MRI, not plain film. One of my partners had a great catch awhile ago. Sketchy pt with a URI, myalgias, and back pain with fever. he started with blood work and found a 30k white count and + lactate. MRI showed huge epidural abscess, later drained by nsg and > 1000 cc of pus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, EMEDPA said:

especially fever in folks who are "sketchy". (I'm thinking epidural abscess in the IV drug users). OF course then we are talking MRI, not plain film. One of my partners had a great catch awhile ago. Sketchy pt with a URI, myalgias, and back pain with fever. he started with blood work and found a 30k white count and + lactate. MRI showed huge epidural abscess, later drained by nsg and > 1000 cc of pus. 

This guy was "sick", the pt in the OP clearly was not!

'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
6 minutes ago, CAdamsPAC said:

This guy was "sick", the pt in the OP clearly was not!

'

would have been easy in this setting to blow this guy off as a "junkie with a cold". I think his temp was only like 99.5 too. this was in a high volume dept that saw > 100k pts/year and we were expected to move the meat and avg 3/hr. I don't work there anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "try explaining it to a jury" argument is a bit of cognitive dissonance that gets trotted out all too frequently. That argument holds for any and every patient you see for any and every problem. Any visit can have some zebra hiding out that has bad implications and "why didn't it get caught at the first visit." Why not do every test imaginable for every possible diagnosis at every visit so you don't have to explain anything to a jury? Because we have standards and recommendations based on good science. I am very cautious but never fearful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EMEDPA said:

would have been easy in this setting to blow this guy off as a "junkie with a cold". I think his temp was only like 99.5 too. this was in a high volume dept that saw > 100k pts/year and we were expected to move the meat and avg 3/hr. I don't work there anymore. 

Why  a proper H&P even in Fast Track is important. My old boss told me even crocks get sick. Add in experience and a good clinical gut feeling you won't miss a guy like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, EMEDPA said:

Scott knows this, but the exception being old folks. some of them cough and get fxs or have metastatic dz, etc

Of course my bar for "old folks" keeps getting older as I do. In school we learned to consider films over age 55. Now I don't think of 55 year olds as being "old". ?

+1

I saw an older guy a few weeks ago, a bounce back who had seen a colleague a few days before. LBP after moving a large appliance - an oven, or something like that. Relatively benign mechanism. I probably wouldn’t have gotten films the first time - hell, almost didn’t do so the second time. But I did, and found a compression fracture. In some ways, it would’ve been no harm, no foul if I’d missed it - it was non-op - but I felt a little sheepish and stupid for not just getting the films without hesitation. I think I have a pretty good gestalt, but I sometimes have to remind myself that there are simple diagnostic tests that can quickly eliminate the low-hanging fruit, and there’s no shame in being careful. Better than being cavalier and having a bad outcome. Not that you should just shotgun tests, but you’ve gotta consider your differential. It’s definitely hard sometimes, especially with the emphasis on volume. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone ask the NP if this neurosurgeon was a buddy of their's and maybe getting a little something in return for even BS consults?  I knew  doc many moons ago I swear was getting kickbacks from a surgeon because he would refer to them and them only, even for things that were really minor and in his scope of practice.

Just kicking that out there as well to stir the pot ?

 

SK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/25/2018 at 9:22 AM, sas5814 said:

1st patient of the day. Healthy 36 YO male with no history or co-morbidities sees an NP in FP with acute low back pain after handling some farm animals 10 days ago. Imaging? Nope.... Ok not really a problem. I might not have either. Meds? Nope. PT Nope. Referral to neurosurgery.

These are the things that make life hard for all of us.

Bad form.

I relish my ability to refer a great number of patients in FP but I dont abuse it. I always ask myself if I have done my (reasonable) due diligence before I refer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/25/2018 at 9:22 AM, sas5814 said:

1st patient of the day. Healthy 36 YO male with no history or co-morbidities sees an NP in FP with acute low back pain after handling some farm animals 10 days ago. Imaging? Nope.... Ok not really a problem. I might not have either. Meds? Nope. PT Nope. Referral to neurosurgery.

These are the things that make life hard for all of us.

Im not sure why you would refer for surgery without acute weakness or neuro defecits...

 

always a fan of the Pred taper, plus PT, plus Chiro, and single Rx for anti inflammatory  if no heart disease for lumbago 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to the Physician Assistant Forum! This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn More