LIPPER Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 I overheard a Nursing supervisor suggest to a PHD Psychologist (who doesn't see patients unelss insurance auth is obtained first) that he should do more gratis work since "we all have to care for these indigent patients".......I get a kick out of Administrators and nurses "suggesting" anyone do more freebee work. Do nurses work for free on self-pay patients? Do administrators take a cut in their salary each week? The PA' MD's have to take it, and somehow I'm made to feel guilty for not showing sympathy. VENTING Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator LT_Oneal_PAC Posted September 15, 2012 Moderator Share Posted September 15, 2012 There are plenty of nurses who volunteer at free clinics for no pay. I wouldn't mind setting aside a day for no pay and only take care of gratis patients at a place for that is usually for profit. I wouldn't even my helping pay for over head that day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIPPER Posted September 15, 2012 Author Share Posted September 15, 2012 I do my share of free work and I don't complain. I don't appreciate listening to those around me who sacrifice nothing, asking for further free work from me or critcize consultants I use that decline self-pay consults. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator LT_Oneal_PAC Posted September 15, 2012 Moderator Share Posted September 15, 2012 I wasn't disagreeing with you. Just adjusting. Nurses=fine. Nurse administrators=demon spawn. Those include "supervisors." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIPPER Posted September 15, 2012 Author Share Posted September 15, 2012 I know... no worries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dobbyrocks Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 Over the years, I have become less sympathetic (meaning, less likely to offer reduced prices) to patients without insurance and MORE likely to reduce my fees to patients with insurance that carry a high deductable. So often THESE patients are paying huge costs out of pocket just to have insurance, then turn around and have to pay again when they receive medical services. On the other hand, patients with out insurance at all have no initial out of pocket costs. I realize not every one can get insurance (maybe turned down due to pre-existing condition) but I see just as many driving a nice car, carrying an expensive cell phone, wearing designer clothes, etc... We have to be honest and admit that many of these patients simply choose not to spend their money on insurance, while others sacrifice to carry a high deductible policy. THAT is the patient I want to help. I guess I can relate since my own insurance costs me about $750 a month (family plan) and has a $10K deductible. That's a lot of money! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator rev ronin Posted September 19, 2012 Administrator Share Posted September 19, 2012 The issue is not, nor has it ever been, insurance. Insurance is simply a way of cost-sharing--in a perfect world, the average person would be unaffected financially by whether or not they had insurance: on average, the cost of insurance would equal the average of their healthcare costs. Tack in a bit for profit and lawyers, and throw in the hugely free-market affecting impact of having employer-paid premiums be non-taxable, and you have the ba-roken system we experience today. Insurance is not "something for nothing", insurance is risk reduction through up-front expenditures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator EMEDPA Posted September 19, 2012 Moderator Share Posted September 19, 2012 -in a perfect world, the average person would be unaffected financially by whether or not they had insurance: on average, the cost of insurance would equal the average of their healthcare costs. . I would argue that in a perfect world anyone who worked full time would have a health insurance policy provided for them by their employers with minimal copays for visits and prescriptions. the elderly/disabled would have govt provided health care as would children of parents without the means of acquiring it for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator LT_Oneal_PAC Posted September 19, 2012 Moderator Share Posted September 19, 2012 Another reason I'm going into the Navy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator EMEDPA Posted September 19, 2012 Moderator Share Posted September 19, 2012 Another reason I'm going into the Navy. I recently discovered a big problem with va medical services for retired vets. I had a pt at my rural job who was in his early 60's with unstable angina. needed to be cathed. the va would pay for care at our facility or the nearest va facility 3 hrs away but not for the transfer between facilities. if he was 65 medicare would pay but he wasn't. they wanted me to d/c his heparin so he could drive unmonitored for 3 hrs to their facility. I basically had to threaten to send him by lifeflight(which is always covered) before they would agree on a 1 time basis to cover a long distance critical care transfer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator rev ronin Posted September 19, 2012 Administrator Share Posted September 19, 2012 I would argue that in a perfect world anyone who worked full time would have a health insurance policy provided for them by their employers with minimal copays for visits and prescriptions.the elderly/disabled would have govt provided health care as would children of parents without the means of acquiring it for them. Why should anyone ever have insurance of any kind? Seriously, why is the discussion of health care always tied up with insurance? Insurance is a cost and risk averaging solution, nothing more. Insurance doesn't create free money to pay for healthcare, it just takes the premiums of the healthy people and allocates them to support the care of the non-healthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator EMEDPA Posted September 19, 2012 Moderator Share Posted September 19, 2012 ok, that was in a perfect american political world.... I'm ok with govt sponsored single payor universal healthcare. it works in every other developed country in the world. yes, your taxes pay for it but everyone draws off what they need from it. no one gets shorted. eventually everyone will need something from the system and the system will provide it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator ventana Posted September 19, 2012 Moderator Share Posted September 19, 2012 I pretty much stopped discounting my services for most social situations - people choose high ded plans, and a lot of the people that don't have ins in MASS have made the choice and conscious decision to take the risk to run with out insurance (and I end up talking to them about this in the OV) If someone is truly caught with out knowing with out insurance I have all teh sympathy in the world for them and will adjust - but just the whinning person that c/o charges gets nothing out of me - I don't go to their workplace and gripe about prices.... and beg for discounts Also on the larger scale by giving it away it patches along a broke system and we just need a whole new system Single Payer is the answer and it is silly we do not have it. Still private delivery of care but just take the 28% that we loose to the health ins costs out of it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d2305 Posted September 20, 2012 Share Posted September 20, 2012 Oneal I here that they have DIs in Newport now. Should be fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.