andersenpa Posted July 26, 2011 Author Share Posted July 26, 2011 I would like to hear feedback from those who submitted a response in favor of SUPERVISING......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 I would like to hear feedback from those who submitted a response in favor of SUPERVISING......... Thats funny... cause I was thinking the exact same thing when I read that a couple hrs ago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 I would like to hear feedback from those who submitted a response in favor of SUPERVISING......... Thats funny... cause I was thinking the exact same thing when I read that a couple hrs ago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator EMEDPA Posted July 26, 2011 Moderator Share Posted July 26, 2011 probably med student trolls. we still have a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator EMEDPA Posted July 26, 2011 Moderator Share Posted July 26, 2011 probably med student trolls. we still have a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andersenpa Posted July 26, 2011 Author Share Posted July 26, 2011 And they still haven't spoken up.............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andersenpa Posted July 26, 2011 Author Share Posted July 26, 2011 And they still haven't spoken up.............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator EMEDPA Posted July 26, 2011 Moderator Share Posted July 26, 2011 And they still haven't spoken up.............. nope, they just copy stuff here to post out of context on sdn to fuel pa hate(cough, cough, socrates, cough, cough) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator EMEDPA Posted July 26, 2011 Moderator Share Posted July 26, 2011 And they still haven't spoken up.............. nope, they just copy stuff here to post out of context on sdn to fuel pa hate(cough, cough, socrates, cough, cough) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andersenpa Posted July 26, 2011 Author Share Posted July 26, 2011 We'll I'm happy to fuel their fire of willful ignorance............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andersenpa Posted July 26, 2011 Author Share Posted July 26, 2011 We'll I'm happy to fuel their fire of willful ignorance............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archerry Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 How about "Collaborating Physician" or some similar variation? Taking a page out the the NP's book vis-a-vis the "Collaboration Agreement". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archerry Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 How about "Collaborating Physician" or some similar variation? Taking a page out the the NP's book vis-a-vis the "Collaboration Agreement". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andersenpa Posted July 27, 2011 Author Share Posted July 27, 2011 How about "Collaborating Physician" or some similar variation? Taking a page out the the NP's book vis-a-vis the "Collaboration Agreement". Well for one we keep the initials SP. Two....we do our own thing. We're not NPs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andersenpa Posted July 27, 2011 Author Share Posted July 27, 2011 How about "Collaborating Physician" or some similar variation? Taking a page out the the NP's book vis-a-vis the "Collaboration Agreement". Well for one we keep the initials SP. Two....we do our own thing. We're not NPs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaryEP Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 "Collaboration" never ceases to remind me of Vichy France. ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaryEP Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 "Collaboration" never ceases to remind me of Vichy France. ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dm123 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Change the name first, then tackle the sponsoring thing. KISS. Too much potential backlash against both by clumping them together. The annals of medicine are anal when it comes to possible turf infractions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dm123 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Change the name first, then tackle the sponsoring thing. KISS. Too much potential backlash against both by clumping them together. The annals of medicine are anal when it comes to possible turf infractions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneValgene Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 I think this depends on where we are in our experience with practice.New grads are most often 'supervised'... while experienced PAs are often what we here consider 'sponsored.' So I would be down for teasing that out IF there was a fluid (non-static) experience requirement mandated. Something like a minimum amount of time practicing in a given area (specialty) to move from "supervision" to "sponsorship". Change specialties... clock resets. Contrarian so...i was one of the few who initially voted 'Supervising Physician', but i'd be down for something like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneValgene Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 I think this depends on where we are in our experience with practice.New grads are most often 'supervised'... while experienced PAs are often what we here consider 'sponsored.' So I would be down for teasing that out IF there was a fluid (non-static) experience requirement mandated. Something like a minimum amount of time practicing in a given area (specialty) to move from "supervision" to "sponsorship". Change specialties... clock resets. Contrarian so...i was one of the few who initially voted 'Supervising Physician', but i'd be down for something like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 so...i was one of the few who initially voted 'Supervising Physician', but i'd be down for something like this So why did you vote for "Supervising' versus "Sponsoring"...??? Please elaborate... Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 so...i was one of the few who initially voted 'Supervising Physician', but i'd be down for something like this So why did you vote for "Supervising' versus "Sponsoring"...??? Please elaborate... Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmj11 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 In a perfect world, I wouldn't mind having a supervising physician who is a thought leader and whom I deeply respect in the area I work. I could name about 50 such physicians around the country. I was happy and proud to call Jerry Swanson, MD (at Mayo Clinic) my supervising physician. I was honored when he reviewed my charts, advised me or took advice from me. The problem arises in the more common circumstances where the SP doesn't have much to offer you except for license requirements. They don't look at your charts because they know that you chart much better than they do, you perform better than they do and they simply have nothing to offer. So sponsoring makes more sense. They meet the legal requirements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmj11 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 In a perfect world, I wouldn't mind having a supervising physician who is a thought leader and whom I deeply respect in the area I work. I could name about 50 such physicians around the country. I was happy and proud to call Jerry Swanson, MD (at Mayo Clinic) my supervising physician. I was honored when he reviewed my charts, advised me or took advice from me. The problem arises in the more common circumstances where the SP doesn't have much to offer you except for license requirements. They don't look at your charts because they know that you chart much better than they do, you perform better than they do and they simply have nothing to offer. So sponsoring makes more sense. They meet the legal requirements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.