Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If not interested in medical studies don’t waste your time with this post.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/21/health/hdl-cholesterol-study/index.html

https://www.diabetes.co.uk/news/news/2022/nov/age-related-macular-degeneration-strongly-associated-with-serious-forms-of-cardiovascular-disease.html.  Leave it to me to fall into this small subset where there appears to be a benefit to ocular vitamins, which I do take at the recommendation of my optometrist.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I know there has always been a significant emphasis on higher HDL levels being good, nobody is ignoring the LDL right? Or have folks been giving patients with both high HDL and LDL a free pass?

The racial disparity is super interesting though, wonder what other factors are driving this. Could assume higher rates of inflammation due to higher incidence of diabetes, maybe nutritional issues in setting of socioeconomic status? General access to care? Have been association with the anti-inflammatory effects of HDL and cardiovascular risk in other studies if I remember right. Genetic?

It's been great to see all the of the studies the last several years showing the medicine isn't blind and we can't take a cookie cutter approach to all ethnicities.

Here's the original article: https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.09.027

Edited by MediMike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was my understanding as I skimmed it that the LDL's were still felt to be bad.  What I haven't gotten my head around are the Ca+ Index scores.  You do the scan to look for calcified plaques.  The problem is that this week still the understanding is that those are the STABLE plaques.  It's the soft, gooey, non-calcified plaques which are the risk.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the majority of sx. CAD cases are micro versus macrovascular (as seen in European studies) and that coronary artery spasm cases are greater in number than we suspect.

Edited by GetMeOuttaThisMess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think as we pivot away from cholesterol & ratios and look more to inflammatory markers (Lp-a, homocysteine, hs-CRP, Type A and B etc) we will see even less importance across the board for both HDL and LDL.....luckily through quest we can do clevelandheartlab panel on almost everyone and get all this data! Boston heart runs an amazing lipid panel also, but coverage is not as good. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to the Physician Assistant Forum! This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn More