Provisional programs

[snowpixi]

I am considering applying to a program with provisional accreditation. Just wondering if anyone could provide info on the pros and cons of doing so? Thanks!

[cinntsp]

Your biggest concern should be the lack of data on PANCE first time pass rates, which can tell a lot about the program. Chances are the program will work out fine but I'd personally be hesitant to attend an unproven program unless it was my only acceptance.

[beattie228]

A big factor for me would be resources. I interviewed at a program with a big name medical school who currently have provisional accreditation because they've only been around for two years. Aside from little data regarding the PANCE pass rate, I felt they had a great program. Provisional accreditation can be alarming at first, but many of the program directors have a long resume of proven success. Additionally, the programs desire to have a solid curriculum in order to compete with the longer established programs. It's a little late in the game for applications for most schools, but a school with provisional accreditation may not be seeing as large a flood of applicants like other programs are this year. If you end up applying during the next CASPA cycle, I would definitely recommend you go check out an information session at the program. That's where you'll really get a feel for how the program is run, and you'll also be able to ask some very pertinent questions with the folks responsible for running the program. With all of that being said, a graduate from a provisional accredited program is still called a PA-C and the big picture is attending a program that will allow you to sit for the PANCE. Best of luck!

[beattie228]

*A graduate from a provisional accredited program is still called a PA-C assuming you pass the PANCE!