SCPA Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Is it necessary to have patients sign a new record release form every time a record from another office is needed, or can they just give us a signed authorization to release records once and reuse that as needed? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DizzyJ Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 Well, that depends. Often med record release states a specific office the patient is granting release of records from. You could put a broad answer like "any treatment facility" and also the forms are often dated and you could put like "valid for 90 days". Keep in mind that often a release is not needed when requesting records in order to facilitate treatment. If you and the other office are both involved in the care of certain conditions, then a release isn't needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator rev ronin Posted July 26, 2017 Administrator Share Posted July 26, 2017 20 hours ago, dizzyjon said: Well, that depends. Often med record release states a specific office the patient is granting release of records from. You could put a broad answer like "any treatment facility" and also the forms are often dated and you could put like "valid for 90 days". As I understand it, signed releases cannot be valid for more than 90 days. 20 hours ago, dizzyjon said: Keep in mind that often a release is not needed when requesting records in order to facilitate treatment. If you and the other office are both involved in the care of certain conditions, then a release isn't needed. Yes, theoretically, but nothing compels the releasing organization to release them without that signed release... they CAN. But there are no consequences if they choose not to, so by and large most/all corporate entities will require a signed release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DizzyJ Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 3 hours ago, rev ronin said: As I understand it, signed releases cannot be valid for more than 90 days. Yes, theoretically, but nothing compels the releasing organization to release them without that signed release... they CAN. But there are no consequences if they choose not to, so by and large most/all corporate entities will require a signed release. Run into this all the time both from large corporate entities and small private practice. Majority do want that signed release. I just wish they understood that was an unnecessary delay in medical treatment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.