Hemegroup Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 [h=1]http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130515151945.htm[/h] So what, either or? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
303909 Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Those outcomes are dramatically different. You get used to some subtle numbers in research that are nevertheless significant so statistical grenades really stand out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hemegroup Posted May 20, 2013 Author Share Posted May 20, 2013 Yup, it is significant. But it doesn't bring rep lunches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leona Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130515151945.htm So what, either or? Why there should be such a discrepancy between the two? But yea, I've read it... Cholesterol-Lowering drugs impairs exercise training adaptations. Much better if you'll do it naturally. Well, exercise is more significant for me. Fitness has proven to be the most significant predictor of longevity and health because it protects people from a variety of chronic diseases. You can just try the Flora Products in lowering your cholesterol level and go on with the exercises. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.