Jump to content

Associate not allowed in legislation


Recommended Posts

I think its a big leap to assume AAPA knew this would happen in any specific venue. It sounds like your state medical society is being petty. These type things were fairly predictable and just have to be dealt with as they happen.

It is an unnecessary law as what you can call yourself is probably already defined in statute. Your state society should be able to have it die in committee assuming it even gets that far. It is potsuring by the medical society so they can brag about their work stopping us from killing people.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently 50% progress. How could you say this wasn’t expected? The million dollar research discovered physicians did NOT like associate.They DID think  MCP was best description. My own small group physicians do not want associate but would have been fine with MCP.      Just pitiful, the continued decisions AAPA and recently PAFT have made to stifle growth and ensure future for young PAs. I’ve seen new bills for a few states, not one is getting title change, unless I’ve missed something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well I don't really disagree BUT it wasn't exactly AAPA who picked associate. It was the HOD made up of representatives of all our state societies and specialty societies. As a profession we lack the nards to make bold moves.

When we cease to exist (in a practical sense) there won't be anyone for me to say "I told you so" too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sas5814 said:

well I don't really disagree BUT it wasn't exactly AAPA who picked associate. It was the HOD made up of representatives of all our state societies and specialty societies. As a profession we lack the nards to make bold moves.

When we cease to exist (in a practical sense) there won't be anyone for me to say "I told you so" too.

The experts picked MCP...NOT Associate.  1 million bucks, right down the drain.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yup...so we circle back to the HOD who ignored the results of a 2 year, million dollar study. I guess technically the HOD is AAPA but I think of it more as a body of our elected representatives. So I am sticking with we collectively lack the foresight to see the obvious and the intestinal fortitude to make a bold change.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Hope2PA said:

Illinois has new legislation, Senate bill 145,for Physician assistant. It states they are not allowed to use associate in their title and must introduce as physician assistant. AAPA knew this would occur. They had no intention of helping the profession progress.

 

Reading the bill it appears to me that the ban on using associate is not new language I. The statute. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
3 hours ago, sas5814 said:

yup...so we circle back to the HOD who ignored the results of a 2 year, million dollar study. I guess technically the HOD is AAPA but I think of it more as a body of our elected representatives. So I am sticking with we collectively lack the foresight to see the obvious and the intestinal fortitude to make a bold change.

I spoke with some of my states HOD

Gauwd they were clueless!!  it was demoralizing.... there is no visionary leadership in PA profession....

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to the Physician Assistant Forum! This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn More