Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can not verify the authenticity of the below post but it was forwarded by an ICU PA I know and reportedly posted by an intensivist in Seattle:

 

“Intensivist front line in Seattle” 

* we have 21 pts and 11 deaths since 2/28. 
* we are seeing pts who are young (20s), fit, no comorbidities, critically ill. It does happen. 
* US has been past containment since January
* Currently, all of ICU is for critically ill COVIDs, all of floor medsurg for stable COVIDs and EOL care, half of PCU, half of ER. New resp-sx pts Pulmonary Clinic offshoot is open

* CDC is no longer imposing home quarantine on providers who were wearing only droplet iso PPE when intubating, suctioning, bronching, and in one case doing bloody neurosurgery. Expect when it comes to your place you may initially have staff home-quarantined. Plan for this NOW. Consider wearing airborne iso PPE for aerosol-generating procedures in ANY pt in whom you suspect COVID, just to prevent the mass quarantines.

* we ran out of N95s (thanks, Costco hoarders) and are bleaching and re-using PAPRs, which is not the manufacturer's recommendation. Not surprised on N95s as we use mostly CAPRs anyway, but still.

*terminal cleans (inc UV light) for ER COVID rooms are taking forever, Enviro Services is overwhelmed. Bad as pts are stuck coughing in the waiting room. Rec planning now for Enviro upstaffing, or having a plan for sick pts to wait in their cars (that is not legal here, sadly).

* CLINICAL INFO based on our cases and info from CDC conf call today with other COVID providers in US:

* the Chinese data on 80% mildly ill, 14% hospital-ill, 6-8% critically ill are generally on the mark. Data very skewed by late and very limited testing, and the number of our elderly pts going to comfort care. 

- being young & healthy (zero medical problems) does not rule out becoming vented or dead - probably the time course to developing significant lower resp sx is about a week or longer (which also fits with timing of sick cases we started seeing here, after we all assumed it was endemic as of late Jan/early Feb). 

- based on our hospitalized cases (including the not formally diagnosed ones who are obviously COVID 

- it is quite clinically unique) about 1/3 have mild lower resp sx, need 1-5L NC. 1/3 are sicker, FM or NRB. 1/3 tubed with ARDS. 

Thus far, everyone is seeing: 
- nl WBC. Almost always lymphopenic, occasionally poly-predominant but with nl total WBC. Doesn't change, even 10days in.

 - BAL lymphocytic despite blood lymphopenic (try not to bronch these pts; this data is from pre-testing time when we had several idiopathic ARDS cases) 

- fevers, often high, may be intermittent; persistently febrile, often for >10d. It isn't the dexmed, it's the SARS2. 
- low ProCalc; may be useful to check initially for later trending if later concern for VAP etc. 

- up AST/ALT, sometimes alk phos. Usually in 70-100 range. No fulminant hepatitis. Notably, in our small sample, higher transaminitis at admit (150-200) correlates with clinical deterioration and progression to ARDS. LFTs typically begin to bump in 2nd week of clinical course. - mild AKI (Cr <2). Uncertain if direct viral effect, but notably SARS2 RNA fragments have been identified in liver, kidneys, heart, and blood.

* characteristic CXR always bilateral patchy or reticular infiltrates, sometimes perihilar despite nl EF and volume down at presentation. At time of presentation may be subtle, but always present, even in our pts on chronic high dose steroids. NO effusions. CT is as expected, rarely mild mediastinal LAD, occ small effusions late in course which might be related to volume status/cap leak.

* Note - China is CT'ing everyone, even outpts, as a primarily diagnostic modality. However, in US/Europe, CT is rare, since findings are nonspecific, would not change management, and the ENTIRE scanner and room have to terminal-cleaned, which is just impossible in a busy hospital. Also, transport in PAPRs. Etc. 2 of our pts had CTs for idiopathic ARDS in the pre-test era; they looked like the CTs in the journal articles. Not more helpful than CXR. - when resp failure occurs, it is RAPID (likely 7-10d out from sx onset, but rapid progression from hospital admit). Common scenario for our pts is, admit 1L NC. Next 12hrs -> NPPV. Next 12-24hrs -> vent/proned/Flolan. 

- interestingly, despite some needing Flolan, the hypoxia is not as refractory as with H1N1. Quite different, and quite unique. Odd enough that you'd notice and say hmmm. 

- thus far many are dying of cardiac arrest rather than inability to ventilate/oxygenate. 

- given the inevitable rapid progression to ETT once resp decompensation begins, we and other hosps, including Wuhan, are doing early intubation. Facemask is fine, but if needing HFNC or NPPV just tube them. They definitely will need a tube anyway, & no point risking the aerosols. 

- no MOSF. There's the mild AST/ALT elevation, maybe a small Cr bump, but no florid failure. except cardiomyopathy. 

- multiple pts here have had nl EF on formal Echo or POCUS at time of admit (or in a couple of cases EF 40ish, chronically). Also nl Tpn from ED. Then they get the horrible resp failure, sans sepsis or shock. Then they turn the corner, off Flolan, supined, vent weaning, looking good, never any pressor requirement. Then over 12hrs, newly cold, clamped, multiple-pressor shock that looks cardiogenic, EF 10% or less, then either VT->VF-> dead or PEA-> asystole in less than a day. 

Needless to say this is awful for families who had started to have hope. 

- We have actually had more asystole than VT, other facilities report more VT/VF, but same time course, a few days or a week after admit, around the time they're turning the corner. This occurs on med-surg pts too; one today who is elderly and chronically ill but baseline EF preserved, newly hypoTN overnight, EF<10. Already no escalation, has since passed, So presumably there is a viral CM aspect, which presents later in the course of dz. 

- of note, no WMAs on Echo, RV preserved, Tpns don't bump. Could be unrelated, but I've never seen anything like it before, esp in a pt who had been HD stable without sepsis.

Treatment -

*Remdesivir might work, some hosps have seen improvement with it quite rapidly, marked improvement in 1-3 days. ARDS trajectory is impressive with it, pts improve much more rapidly than expected in usual ARDS.

*Recommended course is 10d, but due to scarcity all hosps have stopped it when pt clinically out of the woods - none have continued >5d. It might cause LFT bump, but interestingly seem to bump (200s-ish) for a day or 2 after starting then rapidly back to normal - suggests not a primary toxic hepatitis.

*unfortunately, the Gilead compassionate use and trial programs require AST/ALT <5x normal, which is pretty much almost no actual COVID pts. Also CrCl>30, which is fine. CDC is working with Gilead to get LFT reqs changed now that we know this is a mild viral hepatitis.

-currently the Gilead trial is wrapping up, NIH trial still enrolling, some new trial soon to begin can't remember where.

*steroids are up in the air. In China usual clinical practice for all ARDS is high dose methylpred. Thus, ALL of their pts have had high dose methylpred. Some question whether this practice increases mortality.

*it is likely that it increases seconday VAP/HAP. China has had a high rate of drug resistant GNR HAP/VAP and fungal pna in these pts, with resulting increases mortality. We have seen none, even in the earlier pts who were vented for >10d before being bronched (prior to test availability, again it is not a great idea to bronch these pts now).

- unclear whether VAP-prevention strategies are also different, but wouldn't think so?

- Hong Kong is currently running an uncontrolled trial of HC 100IV Q8.

- general consensus here (in US among docs who have cared for COVID pts) is that steroids will do more harm than good, unless needed for other indications.

- many of our pts have COPD on ICS. Current consensus at Evergreen, after some observation & some clinical judgment, is to stop ICS if able, based on known data with other viral pneumonias and increased susceptibility to HAP. Thus far pts are tolerating that, no major issues with ventilating them that can't be managed with vent changes. We also have quite a few on AE-COPD/asthma doses of methylpred, so will be interesting to see how they do.

-name removed per their request.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm somewhat local to the aforementioned individual.  Have seen a couple come through, one was extubated after 2 days, doing fairly well, hasn't progressed to any type of MODS phenotype.  Have run into issues with logistics/supply issues.

Sending off a request for remdesivir for one other, will see what happens!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also running into the problem of overtesting in the community, i.e. SNF has a patient who had a cough/runny nose so they automatically send off a COVID swab, patient is subsequently admitted for a bowel perf or seizures and guess what...because they are a r/o they get the full meal deal when they actually had seasonal allergies.  This ends up with a "for-realsies" rule out sitting in the ED boarding.  Sigh.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Got this email.  Looks like their healthcare system is overwhelmed and likely significant staff quarantined.  
5224eeb5-237c-4333-a0fd-c42796e16f99.jpg
S.gif
 
MAPA has received a request for PAs to help in 
both Washington State and  San Carlos, CA
 
Please send ALL inquires directly to atarianna.furr@ami.health for more information
 
DO NOT CONTACT MAPA
 
Please see below the details for AMI’s response in Kirkland, Washington this upcoming Monday 15th.
 
AMI is looking for U.S. based Nurse Practitioners (NP), Physicians Assistants (PA) and Registered Nurses (RN) to join our team for an IMMEDIATE response effort in support of COVID-19. The response team will be deployed to Kirkland, Washington on the 15th of March. The team will consist of 30 registered nurses and 6 PAs/NPs. This response is in support of current efforts at the Life Care Center facility providing medical care to individuals with COVID-19 and those exposed to COVID-19. All Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) per the CDC standards will be provided. This project will be a minimum of 14 workdays. Personnel will be AMI contracted consultants under a contract AMI has with the Department of Health and Human Services. HHS already has staff onsite that will provide a handoff to our staff.
 
Location: Life Care Center in Kirkland, Washington.
Deployment date: March 15th, 2020.
Positions available: 3
Three shifts a day, each shift is 8 hours. Shifts will be 10 RNs and 2 PAs/NPs on at a time.
Travel and accommodation are covered by AMI. Accommodation in the form of hotel rooms.
Please see the rates below to share with any RN, PA, NP connections you may have.
 
Please have them contact me directly atarianna.furr@ami.health for more information.
 
Visit us online at ami.health
 
 
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean...that place is a SNF. I imagine they have trouble finding anyone to work there in the best of times. We are definitely not overwhelmed over here. There is likely a dearth of individuals wanting to work at that specific location but overall things aren't that bad, just kind of annoying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In Indiana we are in the initial stages of the outbreak, I was in attendance to the first patient death in the state this morning. I am recommending skipping bipap at the infection control meeting I have schedule this afternoon as mentioned in the OP. I was wondering if you all had insight as to infection control procedures being adopted due to limited resources, specifically for aerosol producing procedures. Any input, even anecdotal, would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is in Indianapolis. The number of suspect patients in this hospital alone is getting close to 50, only 2 are in critical condition. I was surprised to see that the the number had not been updated as the confirmed cases were. I am sure that since it is the first death in state there will be a delay in releasing the info

 

Edited by DomRRTtoPA
there was a news conference 10 min after this posting.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The state is getting 50,000 rapid tests with a 3-4 hour turn around whenever they decide to make the delivery this week. At least that is the latest info that I received. Symptomatic patients are not being counted as confirmed until tested. So far we have treated the crit pts with plaquenil, remdesivir was approved but did not arrive before the pt expired and use of the ards.net protocol (proning was inappropriate due to cardiac instability). Many of the things listed in the OP are accurate and appropriate based off my limited experience. I have spent some time in the ED and things have been crazy. No visitor policy, people being turned away at the door for flu like symptoms, supply shortages, elimination of all aerosol treatments, you name it. Stay safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By COVIDquestions
      Would people please reply with the name of their PA school and if you have:
      -mandatory in-person lectures (and since when)
      -optional online lectures
      -online lectures only
      My school has required all classes in person since August 2020 even though COVID numbers are worse now than they were in the summer. They tell us it's required for accreditation, but I am finding out several PA schools are either all online or give their students an option. I understand requiring skills labs and exams in-person, but lectures in person seem unnecessary and irresponsible. Knowing that many schools have an option for online lectures would help us make a better case to stay safer at home. Thanks for your help!
    • By surgblumm
      What’s In A Name?
      Robert M. Blumm, PA, DFAAPA, PA-C Emeritus
       
       
      The title of this article is an echo of Shakespeare, but let me assure you that today’s theme is not about Romeo and Juliet. The title question put forth has a very significant meaning to all people regardless of nationality, culture, ethnicity, or religion. A person’s name - any person - is the greatest connection to their identity and their individuality. Its importance cannot be underestimated if we are speaking of a profession, a practice, a company, a corporation, or of an individual itself. Think of names such as The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Fleetwood Mac, Michael Jackson, or presidents such as Lincoln, Roosevelt, and Washington. Their names speak immediately to their contributions and historical significance to our society. Over the last twenty-five years, we have been either delighted with the name of our profession or have despised it for its misinterpretation by patients, administrators, and physicians. PAs are very opinionated, and, regardless of what we call ourselves, we will never reach a consensus.
      We have agonized over the issue of our name. Perhaps we should, rather, have joined the group that will legislatively assist us in finding a compromise that makes us all satisfied, if not happy. AAPA commissioned a marketing/branding national group to investigate this issue and their input was based on speaking to all of the stakeholders in the medical profession as well as the general public and the name chosen was Medical Care Practitioner. They asked America and America voted but nothing will be official until the next meeting of the AAPA. I mourn the loss of associates but realize that it was not the best description of what we do as professionals.
      A PA-Student, Mr. Scott Burns, commented on Ten Arguments for MCP and had this to say: “More PAs want to be called physician associates right now. That's a fair point, but PAs already know what we do, the purpose of a professional title isn't meant for those in the field, it's meant for those outside of the field to understand what that profession is. Patients, physicians, and employers all thought Medical Care Practitioners made more sense and made them more likely to recommend us. We have to put our patients, lawmakers, and employers ahead of our personal preferences to have the most effective title to move forward as a profession.”
      This young man will probably be a leader in the PA profession in the next ten years because he is a thoughtful and patient person who has the power of reason and not the emotional baggage that some of us have after being PAs for ten, twenty, and thirty years or more.
      So, returning to our question: “What’s in a name?”  We spent months deliberating on this as we named our children. I received an email from the Golden Doodles Facebook member begging for input on naming a new puppy! What’s in a name when you are choosing your medical malpractice insurance or making the decision to purchase personal insurance coverage? Astute PAs and NPs will need to observe malpractice weather conditions. Who is being included or excluded from legal action and are they dependent or independent practitioners? What is their experience, their training, their certifications, and their malpractice history with NPI? When concerned with treating COVID 19 patients, have they been trained in this through past experience, or are they being “floated” to the area that is most needy without prior exposure to the care and treatment of this special patient? Do these patients deserve more than hospitals are presently providing? Do we have PPE? Are we bringing this virus home to our families and friends? Are we reporting to duty when we are sick or not fully recovered because it is expected of us? Do we have an obligation to the patient to give the newest treatment modalities? If questioned by an attorney on malpractice litigation two or three years from now, would we look ill-prepared? Do we have a quality, comprehensive policy that will be able to defend us based on years of healthcare experience and previous cases litigated?
      Who is the best in the malpractice landscape? IMHO is a company with the highest A.M. Best rating which can easily be found online. It is a company that can underwrite coverage in all fifty states and has a long history of protecting its valued customers. It is a company that does not “cherry-pick” their clients by profession or time in the field and has no restrictions on their specialty. Did you know that some of the “new” companies do not cover every specialty? Did you know that some of these companies will not cover a surgical PA in NY? You need a company that does not look for the most profitable practitioners or the practitioner with the lowest risk. You also need to be aware of the types of policies that they provide and why one might be preferable to another for your situation.                                                                                                                   
      I write every article with the same focus and purpose; I try to discuss new issues or talk about a treatment that we need to be familiar with - and then consider its liability potential and risk exposure for PAs.  Then, naturally, the very real need for malpractice protection. I’m being upfront about this because I am concerned about the careers and financial safety of all PA and NP providers. This is not a gimmick that I am paid to do, but a call or concern for all of us who are or have been on the frontlines of medical care.
    • By eluch15
      Surprisingly, I did not see any threads about this! As an incoming student that has no idea how this pandemic will affect PA school during the spring/summer, I want to hear how your school dealt with COVID-19 and the pros/cons of things transferring online! 
    • By MGracier
      CASPA failed to process my application before the deadline of October 1. They apparently had an issue processing the COVID—19 Transcript Delay Form. I checked in both through phone and email, and still, they failed to verify prior to the deadline. I submitted all material July. 
      has anyone else had this issue? 
    • By alphaPA
      I am applying for 2021-22 cycle. I graduated recently and don't have any formal work experience. I am tired of applying to jobs, cold-calling clinics and hospitals for jobs. I even offered to work for free. I am licensed (EKG, and phleb) then also I am getting rejected. Nobody wants to hire anymore, they don't even need free services. I am a person of color, I hope that is not the reason.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to the Physician Assistant Forum! This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn More