Jump to content

frustrated


Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

Yet another night of dictating and working for free  (AHHHHHH I hate working at night....)

 

Billing company just advised me that I can not bill for the 99497 for reviewing the MOLST form for anywhere but the office.  As I do house calls this is just insane.  

 

just beyond belief that Primary care makes you jump through so many stupid hoops.  Heck there is less paperwork for the orthos to get paid for a surgery then for me to get a lousy $80 for spending a 1/2 hour with a frail HOH elderly slightly demented patient to discuss hugely important issues..... this system is broke....

 

vent done.....  climbing off my soap box to go to bed.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot tolerate the idea that you have to spend 30 minutes face-to-face in order to bill for advanced directives.  It is never going to happen.  Friggin' insane.  I can see two patients in the time it takes me to discuss the POLST (that's what we call it).  And I can usually discuss the POLST in much less time.  I think the way around this is to do a counseling dominated established visit for 25 minutes and bill a 99214 instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

I cannot tolerate the idea that you have to spend 30 minutes face-to-face in order to bill for advanced directives.  It is never going to happen.  Friggin' insane.  I can see two patients in the time it takes me to discuss the POLST (that's what we call it).  And I can usually discuss the POLST in much less time.  I think the way around this is to do a counseling dominated established visit for 25 minutes and bill a 99214 instead.

You don't have it right, their is two codes

99497 is for < 30 min

99498? I think - is for > 30 min

 

I usually take about 10-20 min to review, and Bill a 99497

 

 

 

 

today I got an email from AAHCM - American Academy Home Care Medicine - stating it specially should be paid in house calls.....

 

Yet another way to screw the PCP....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My recent battle involved Qvar - my least favorite inhaled steroid.

It is actually sampled for some reason.

 

My partner gave a patient a sample.

He failed. His symptoms are not improved.

He needs a LABA with steroid.

 

I sent in the pre-auth.

 

The morons will NOT COUNT A SAMPLE as a trial. It has to be a written and supposedly paid for prescription before they will consider it a real trial.

 

So, I saved them money and tried the stupid drug on the patient and they don't recognize that effort.

 

Meanwhile, guy is doing great on the dual inhaler samples I gave him and his daily function is improved and his symptoms are abated.

 

So, let me get this straight..... I am supposed to take him off a proven med that is working - let him suffer - risk his health and safety -- and give him an inferior drug that he has to frigging pay for ---- and then show his failure and then they MIGHT pay for a combo inhaler.

 

Somewhere, someone has died doing this - I have no doubt. Do you suppose the person at the insurance company was held responsible????? Not a chance.

 

Common Sense is dead and buried and likely never to return to the practice of medicine in the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to the Physician Assistant Forum! This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn More