Jump to content

SoCal_PA

Members
  • Content Count

    286
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

SoCal_PA last won the day on April 27 2019

SoCal_PA had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

172 Excellent

About SoCal_PA

  • Rank
    Registered

Profile

  • Profession
    Physician Assistant

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. https://money.usnews.com/careers/best-jobs/rankings/the-100-best-jobs The difference on their list is $1,500. I think most of us would trade that insignificant amount for more independence
  2. The NPs already have us beat as far as independence and legislation. I wonder why they keep coming up under us on these lists
  3. For comparison, I am in my 3rd year in LA doing internal med. I made just over 150k last year with this job without any OT. We get 9 holidays paid off plus 5 weeks PTO plus 1 week CME time off. Sounds like a good job for first gig as long as they don't overwork you
  4. Pretty low turnout compared to the previous two polls
  5. California needs to step up! Nice win for Florida
  6. Sounds like a good opportunity. So how much could you make if you hustle vs how much you make now with a more relaxed schedule?
  7. It's about that time again. My annual income poll! Last year, we got almost 300 votes (image of past poll is attached). So many people chose "above $200k" that I had to make more options... Answer with how much you are compensated with as PA. Include your full time, part time, per diem, bonuses etc. Do not include your other benefits like health, dental, 401k etc.
  8. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/919415 Here is the text for those who cannot see it all. Proposals on Medicare Pay for NPs, PAs WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump today ordered federal officials to consider pegging Medicare reimbursement more closely to time spent with patients, seeking to address potential pay disparities between physicians and other healthcare professionals. These directives are among the tasks Trump gave to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in an executive order. The order also demanded HHS develop several proposals related to insurer-run Medicare Advantage, including one regarding payments for new technologies. Trump signed the executive order after giving a speech at a rally in Florida The executive order gives HHS a 1-year deadline to propose a regulation that Trump describes as intended to let healthcare professionals spend more time with patients. This regulation is meant to ensure that services, whether done by physicians, physician assistants (PAs), or nurse practitioners, "are appropriately reimbursed in accordance with the work performed rather than the clinician's occupation," the order said. The order also tasks HHS with proposing a regulation to end what Trump called Medicare's "burdensome" requirements that are "more stringent" than federal and state laws require. The president intends to remove barriers that keep some personnel "from practicing at the top of their profession." On a Thursday morning call with reporters, HHS Secretary Alex Azar said Medicare policies now sometimes "prevent people like nurse practitioners, PAs, et cetera from really maximizing the full value and training and licensure that they have through supervision requirements or other artificial limitations." But it's unclear when and if the items listed in Trump's executive order will ever take effect. In the order, Trump asked HHS to begin work on new regulations. There are many potential obstacles in attempts by any administration of any political party at promulgating rules. These include pushback from industry, congressional disapproval, and competing demands on the attention of leaders within an administration. State or Federal? Still, Trump's executive order serves as another example of what seems to be growing interest in Washington in examining how Medicare pays and regulates the practice of different kinds of healthcare professionals. In the draft 2020 Medicare physician fee schedule, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) included a proposal that would largely defer to state law and state scope of practice for PAs. States should have "the flexibility to develop requirements for PA services that are unique and appropriate for their respective state," CMS said in the draft rule, published in August in the Federal Register. In a comment submitted to CMS in September, the American Medical Association (AMA) recommended Medicare instead maintain the current regulations on physician supervision for physician assistant services. If CMS does opt to finalize the proposed changes, AMA asked the agency to further revise the regulation to ensure physicians maintain the ultimate responsibility for coordinating and managing the patient's care. In the letter, AMA also urged CMS to remove certain proposed regulatory language: "In the absence of state law governing physician supervision of PA services, the physician supervision required by Medicare for PA services would be evidenced by documentation in the medical record of the PA's approach to working with physicians in furnishing their services." "Some states require physician collaboration, which still requires that physicians maintain the ultimate responsibility for coordinating and managing the patient's care," wrote James L. Madara, AMA's chief executive officer, in a September 24 comment to CMS. "Yet, this proposed language could be interpreted to preempt these state laws to, in effect, have the unintended consequence of eliminating any physician oversight of physician assistants, opening the door for independent practice of PAs," Madara added. And, as Medscape Medical News previously reported, an influential panel in June recommended Medicare end a policy that lets medical practices bill at higher physician rates for services provided by certain other members of medical teams. In a report to Congress, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) recommended eliminating "incident-to" billing for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and PAs. Instead, APRNs and PAs should consistently bill Medicare directly under their own national provider identifier for the services they provide, MedPAC said.
  9. "The Bureau of Labor Statistics is a unit of the United States Department of Labor. It is the principal fact-finding agency for the U.S. government in the broad field of labor economics and statistics and serves as a principal agency of the U.S. Federal Statistical System." 10 year growth outlook of 31%. The future looks pretty bright for us which contrasts the doom and gloom we see on this and other PA forums. Two years ago, the predicted growth was 37% from 2016-2026. Still pretty good compared to other careers. Pharmacy has a 0% growth rate for the next 10 years, for example.
  10. Signed and sent. Can anyone tell me what this would do for CA PAs? What actual changes would we see if this passes?
  11. $1500/yr which can roll over to the next year for a max of $3k One week PTO paid time off/year Licensing, DEA, etc is paid from a separate account
  12. Was reading some comments....wtf "I am in support of the PTA/OTA 85% reimbursement reduction fee schedule if a OTA/PTA is the only one providing treatment. This is no different than the physician and ARNP/PA-C fee reduction requirement. By In-acting this rule, it ensures that payment will match the skill level provided. It will help to enhance quality of care by promoting the use of more educated therapists over organizations attempting to maximize profits by utilizing lower skilled PTA/OTA's with a lower salary. However, in instances where the more skilled therapist is not fully available, just as ARNP/PA-C's, it still allows payment enough for an OTA/PTA to be used in substitution, as these positions was originally attended." We are the same as a PT assistant everyone. Name change needs to happen
  13. Wait a second.... are we seeing actual positive steps forward?
  14. We voted on April 1st for title change and then heard about the results in May. It's now August (basically) and I am curious to see what, if any, progress has been made.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to the Physician Assistant Forum! This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn More